Consistent with our original conclusion, laser therapy would appear to show some promise as a treatment for neck pain. We were not, however, able to explain the conflicting

results regarding the efficacy of laser therapy, nor the reasons for medium- but not short-term benefits. Thus, the Abstract to the original paper should be revised to note that: ‘Treatment with laser therapy resulted in better pain and disability outcomes at medium-term follow-up but not at short-term follow-up. “
“Physiotherapists commonly assess and treat patients with lower extremity joint disorders. Despite varying levels of evidence, a growing number of studies have shown that manual joint Pexidartinib order mobilisations or manipulations are effective in certain disorders such as hip and knee osteoarthritis, patellofemoral pain syndrome, ankle inversion sprain, plantar fasciitis, metatarsalgia, and hallux limitus/rigidus (Brantingham et al 2009). Measurement of passive movement is indicated in order to assess joint restrictions and to help diagnose these disorders. Passive movement, either physiological or accessory, can be reported as range of

motion, end-feel, or pain and is an indication of the integrity of joint structures (Cyriax 1982, Hengeveld and Banks 2005, Kaltenborn 2002). Passive physiological range of motion may be measured using vision or instruments Imatinib solubility dmso such as goniometers or inclinometers. An essential requirement of clinical measures is that they are valid and reliable so that they can be used to discriminate between individuals (Streiner and Norman 2008). Inter-rater reliability is a component of reproducibility along with agreement

and refers to the relative measurement error, ie, the variation between patients as measured by different raters in relation to the total variance of the measurements (De Vet et al 2006, Streiner and Norman 2008). High inter-rater reliability for measurements of lower extremity joints is a prerequisite for valid and uniform clinical decisions about joint restrictions and related disorders (Bartko and Carpenter 1976). Several reviews have systematically summarised and appraised the evidence with to respect to the inter-rater reliability of passive movements of human joints. Seven systematic reviews have been published on passive spinal and pelvic movement including segmental intervertebral motion assessment (Haneline et al 2008, Hestbæk and Leboeuf-Yde 2000, May et al 2006, Seffinger et al 2004, Stochkendahl et al 2006, Van Trijffel et al 2005, Van der Wurff et al 2000). In general, inter-rater reliability was found to be poor and studies were of low methodological quality. A recent systematic review showed better inter-rater reliability for measurements of passive physiological range of motion in upper extremity joints using instruments compared to measurements using vision and compared to measurements of end-feel or accessory range of motion (Van de Pol et al 2010).