Data collection instruments used in this study were Diabetes Mana

Data collection instruments used in this study were Diabetes Management Self-Efficacy Scale and Summary

of Diabetes Self-Care Activities Measure. Outcomes were determined by changes in glycaemic control self-efficacy and glycaemic control behaviour of patients with type 2 DM.\n\nResults. The findings revealed that the experimental group showed statistically significant improvement in glycaemic control self-efficacy and glycaemic control behaviour immediately and four months after the intervention (F = 26.888, df = 1, 155, p < 0.05 and F = 18.619, df = 1, Selleckchem GKT137831 155, p < 0.05, respectively).\n\nConclusions. One-month hospital-based clinic intervention could be useful in improving glycaemic control self-efficacy and glycaemic control behaviour.\n\nRelevance to clinical practice. Nurses can learn and use the sources of self-efficacy to enhance patients’ self-efficacy Duvelisib in vitro on their glycaemic control in clinical care. The health education is most important in nursing care and should be considered while organising the hospital-based clinic intervention.”
“Purpose: To measure the thickness of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) of patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP) and that of normal controls by scanning laser polarimetry with enhanced corneal compensation (GDxECC) and RTVue-optical coherence tomography (OCT). Methods: Fifty-two eyes

of 26 patients were included. All patients underwent complete ophthalmological examinations and testing with GDxECC. Twenty-eight of 52 eyes of RP patients underwent RTVue-OCT measurements. A group of 50 eyes of 25 normal subjects (controls) was also included. GDxECC measured RNFL thickness in the peripapillary area in all subjects as well as temporal-superior-nasal-inferior-temporal (TSNIT) parameters, including TSNIT means, superior

and inferior region means, LY2835219 chemical structure TSNIT standard deviation (SD), inter-eye symmetry and nerve fiber indicator (NFI). RTVue-OCT measured the mean, superior, inferior, temporal and nasal quadrant RNFL thickness. Result: In RP patients and controls, TSNIT means by GDxECC were, respectively, 65.00 +/- 7.35 and 55.32 +/- 5.20. Mean superior quadrant thicknesses were80.56 +/- 10.93 and 69.54 +/- 7.45. Mean inferior thicknesses were 80.58 +/- 9.34 and 69.12 +/- 7.78. SDs were 27.92 +/- 5.21 and 28.23 +/- 4.01. Inter-eye symmetries were 0.82 +/- 0.17 and 0.87 +/- 0.09. NFIs were 9.74 +/- 8.73 and 16.81 +/- 8.13. The differences between mean TSNIT, mean superior and mean inferior quadrant thicknesses and NFIs were statistically significant (p < 0.001). In RTVue-OCT measurements, the differences between mean, superior, inferior and temporal quadrant RNFL thicknesses were statistically significant (p = 0.0322, 0.0213, 0.0387, 0.0005). Conclusions: The RNFL measured by GDxECC was significantly thicker in RP patients than in controls. RNFL thickness measured by RTVue-OCT was significantly greater in RP patients than in controls in the superior, inferior and temporal regions.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>