Electrode location, reference contraction, and normalization procedure conformed to recommendations by Selleck Sapanisertib Mathiassen et al. (1995). To study any changes in muscle activation of relevance in everyday activities as a result of taking part in one of the two interventions, we chose to record sEMG from the trapezius muscle while the subject performed different

tasks representing gross motor movements with and without precision demand, a stress-inducing task, as well as the standardized domestic work task in randomized order. The global 10th percentile of the sEMG GDC 0032 datasheet while performing these tests was chosen to represent the muscle activity and illustrate changes seen from baseline to the follow-ups. Statistical analysis Descriptive statistics for the entire study population, as well as stratified for each intervention group, were calculated at baseline. The change from baseline to first and second follow-up was compared. The association

between work ability and decreased pain or decreased Epacadostat concentration muscle activity between different occasions was also assessed. For non-normally distributed data, Wilcoxon’s signed rank test was used and for normally distributed data, Student’s t-test for dependent observation was used. Participants with decreased pain and decreased muscle activity

were selected and Y-27632 2HCl the change in work ability between baseline and first, as well as second, follow-up was calculated. The dichotomizations of decreased pain and muscle activity resulted in too few participants in each intervention group; thus, the entire study population was compared. All results with P value < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Longitudinal analysis for repeated measurements with an unstructured covariance matrix was used to assess change between groups over time for WAI items and neck pain (Fitzmaurice et al. 2004). The program PROC MIXED in SAS, version 9.1 (SAS Inc., Cary, NC, USA), was used to implement the analysis method. Data for accessing WAI items and neck pain were considered normally distributed. All statistical analysis was performed using SAS, version 9.1 (Incorporated SI 2004). Results Work ability, health, and pain Self-rated work ability At baseline, the intervention groups did not differ in any self-rated measures (P < 0.05). Most subjects (n = 50, 80%) were classified as having poor work ability (Table 1). The mean values of work ability were low in all groups at baseline (Table 2). Among the whole study group, all self-rated dimensions of work ability increased during the study period (Table 2).