Figure 5 Topologies derived from the Basic matrix (1222 positions). A) consensus of the trees obtained under the MP criterion with transversion/transition ratio set to 1:3 and the ML criterion; B) consensus of the MP trees obtained with the transversion/transition ratio 1:1. The type species Nirogacestat molecular weight A. nasoniae is designated by the orange asterisk. Figure 6 Phylogenetic tree derived from Basic matrix (1222 positions) using Bayesian analysis. Names of the taxa clustering within the Arsenophonus clade are printed in colour: red for the long-branched taxa,

dark orange for the short-branched taxa. Names in the brackets designate the host family. Numbers www.selleckchem.com/products/stattic.html represent Bayesian posterior probability for each node. The type species A. nasoniae is designated by the orange asterisk. The low resolution and instability of the trees inferred from the Conservative matrix suggest that a substantial part of the phylogenetic information

is located within the “”ambiguously”" aligned regions that were removed by the GBlocks procedure. This fact is particularly important when considering the frequent occurrence of Vactosertib molecular weight insertions/deletions within the sequences (see Additional file3). This may lead to deletion of these critical fragments in many phylogenetic analyses. Interestingly, the monophyletic nature of Arsenophonus was preserved even in this highly Conservative matrix. This indicates that within the complete data set, the phylogenetic information underlying the Arsenophonus monophyly is sufficiently strong and is contained in the conservative regions of the sequences. In accordance with this presumption, several molecular synapomorphies can be identified in the Basic and Conservative matrices. The most pronounced is the motif GTC/GTT located in positions 481–483 and 159–161 of Basic matrix and Conservative matrix, respectively. Relevance of the sampling To test an effect of sampling on the phylogenetic inference within Arsenophonus, we examined five Sampling matrices with different taxa compositions (see the section Methods). In addition to the MP, ML, and Bayesian analyses, we performed an ML calculation under the nonhomogeneous model of the substitutions, designated as T92 [31, 32].

This model was previously used to test the monophyly/polyphyly Selleck Y27632 of the P-symbiotic lineages and brought the first serious evidence for a possible independent origin of major P-symbiotic taxa [27]. We were not able to apply the same approach to the Basic and Conservative matrices since the program Phylowin failed to process these large datasets under the ML criterion. The analyses of several taxonomically restricted Sampling matrices proved the sensitivity of phylogenetic signal to the sampling. In the most extreme case, shown in Figure 3A, even the monophyly of the Arsenophonus clade was disrupted by other lineages of symbiotic bacteria. Considering the results of the extensive analysis of the Basic matrix, this arrangement is clearly a methodological artifact.