Four variables that did not significantly affect maximum longevities in our multivariate analyses were nest location, breeding habitat, breeding latitude and migratory behavior (Table 2; Appendix 3). We originally included these variables because previous investigators had called attention to their possible effects on rates of extrinsic mortality and thus senescence. For example, predation

Panobinostat on eggs and nestlings varies with nest location in many bird species (Schaub, Mumme & Woolfenden, 1992; Martin, 1995; Owens & Bennett, 1995; Martin & Ghalambor, 1999; Doerr, Doerr & Jenkins, 2006; Fontaine et al., 2007). However, which nesting locations are most and least susceptible to selleck compound predation varies across species and habitats, and nest location has less impact on survival of adults and post-fledging juveniles

than on eggs and nestlings in most species (Martin & Li, 1992). This is important because, theoretically, the onset of senescence is not expected to occur until reproduction commences (Williams, 1957; Hamilton, 1966), a prediction that has been supported empirically for birds and mammals (Charmantier et al., 2006; Møller, 2006; Jones et al., 2008). In addition, in many avian families nesting locations are variable among species, resulting in intermediate mean values in our family-level analyses that may have obscured any effects of nest location on mean maximum longevities. Breeding habitat type also can affect the likelihood of predation, especially on eggs and nestlings (Martin, 1995; Doerr et al., 2006; Fontaine et al., 2007). However, within breeding habitats rates of extrinsic adult mortality due to predation often depend on breeding density. Breeding density also can increase reproductive costs (e.g. competition for food, mates and nest sites, parasitism, etc.), and

thus affect DOK2 life-history characteristics including senescence (Mysterud et al., 2001; Wilkin et al., 2006; Williams et al., 2006). Unfortunately, data on breeding densities and adult survival rates within and among nesting habitats were not available for the populations of the species whose maximum longevities appear our data base, so we were unable to investigate whether breeding habitat type affects maximum longevity while controlling for breeding densities. We also did not find significant effects of breeding latitude or migratory behavior on maximum longevities (Appendix 3). By contrast, Møller (2007) reported that breeding latitude and migration distance explained, respectively, 3.7 and 2.3% of the variation in avian maximum longevities. He hypothesized that longevities decreased with increasing latitude due to ‘slow life histories’ at low latitudes (Jones et al.