In the context of several education seminars for travel medicine, we asked the physicians in the audience whether they are interested in taking part in a questionnaire study about TT. These colleagues were listed and contacted within a few weeks after the particular education seminar. All participating physicians received a description of the study, three standardized questionnaires
(Q1–3), and the classification of travelers’ TR according to the Vienna consensus meeting in 2001 (Table 1).24 The three questionnaires are available from the corresponding author Lenvatinib concentration on request. Randomly incoming adult travelers seeking medical travel medicine advice prior to
a LHT were asked to participate in the study. If written informed consent was given, Q1 and Q3 were handed out to them together with an envelope for free return consignment for Q3. Q1 asked for age, gender, travel habits, and their individual assessment of the association between travel and TR. These questions had to be answered during the current consultation. Q3 focused on the actually performed TP measures during the particular prophylaxis, experienced side effects or symptoms suspicious for VTE, the means of transport used predominantly during travel, and the period of time seated during the journey. Q3 had to be answered within 4 weeks after the return from the particular journey for which the traveler sought medical advice. The consulted physician had
to answer Q2 asking for assessment of the TR of the traveler, this website the predominantly used means of transport during the planned journey, the duration of planned LHT, and the kind of recommendation given to the individual traveler for the particular journey to prevent TT. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of the University Erlangen-Nuremberg and supported by the “runners-up award” of the International Society of Travel Medicine (5,000 USD). The participating travelers and physicians received an allowance for a completely answered questionnaire Q1 to Q3 of 5, 10, and 10 Euros, respectively. All questionnaires had to be sent to the study center at the university hospital of from Erlangen, Germany. Data were analyzed with statistical software SPSS for Windows, release 15 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), and the statistical software package SAS (version 9.2, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). A descriptive analysis of the important variables was carried out. Associations between the demographic variables age or gender with answers given by the travelers in Q1 were shown in contingency tables and analyzed for significant differences by using the χ2-test or Fisher’s exact test, depending on the cell frequencies.