RESULTS: The overall survival rate was 71% at 1 year, 67% at 3 years, and 55% at 5 years. In univariate analysis, age (P = .003), tumor size (P = .005), lymph node status (P = .008), tumor differentiation (P = .008), transfusion (P = .006), American XMU-MP-1 mw Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class (P = .001), and mandibular reconstruction (P = .045) were associated significantly with overall survival. Multivariate analysis identified only age, histopathologic differentiation, and ASA class as independent risk factors (P < .001, P = .04, and P = .049, respectively).
Age was identified as the strongest independent predictor for overall survival (hazards ratio for each 13-year increase in age, 1,97; 95% confidence interval, 1.36-2.85). CONCLUSIONS: MI-503 molecular weight Transfusion of >4 U of blood did not appear to influence overall survival in patients who underwent primary surgery for oral squamous cell carcinoma. Because age and ASA class evolved as the strongest predictors of shortened overall survival, associated comorbidities may require more attention, particularly in elderly or socially deprived patients. Cancer 2009;115:1481-8. (C) 2009 American Cancer Society.”
“Stimuli occurring in multiple sensory modalities that are temporally synchronous or spatially coincident can be integrated together to enhance perception. Additionally, the semantic content or meaning of a stimulus can influence cross-modal interactions,
improving task performance when these stimuli convey semantically congruent or matching information, but impairing performance when they contain non-matching or distracting information. Attention is one mechanism that is known to alter processing of sensory stimuli by enhancing perception of task-relevant information and suppressing perception of task-irrelevant
stimuli. It is not known, however, to what extent attention to a single sensory modality can minimize the impact of stimuli in the unattended sensory modality and reduce the integration of stimuli across multiple sensory modalities. Our hypothesis was that modality-specific selective attention would limit processing of stimuli in the unattended sensory modality, resulting in a reduction of performance enhancements produced by semantically matching multisensory Liproxstatin-1 purchase stimuli, and a reduction in performance decrements produced by semantically non-matching multisensory stimuli. The results from two experiments utilizing a cued discrimination task demonstrate that selective attention to a single sensory modality prevents the integration of matching multisensory stimuli that is normally observed when attention is divided between sensory modalities. Attention did not reliably alter the amount of distraction caused by non-matching multisensory stimuli on this task; however, these findings highlight a critical role for modality-specific selective attention in modulating multisensory integration.