7,8 Since that time, various experimental methods, paradigms, an

7,8 Since that time, various experimental methods, paradigms, and self-report measures have been developed in attempts to further characterize animal and human conflict behavior and its relationship to psychopathology.3,9-12 Avoidance has been implicated as a cardinal symptom of anxiety disorders13 and is thought to be an underlying mechanism maintaining anxiety. The majority Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical of psychotherapies used to treat anxiety (eg, cognitive-behavioral and exposure-based therapies) aim to decrease such avoidance behavior.14,15 Importantly, avoidance is an active choice process, ie, a decision

that is made to sacrifice potential rewards in order to avoid potential negative outcomes. Individuals with strong avoidance drives in the absence of approach Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical drives would most likely not experience Crizotinib ALK distress and not present to the

clinic – or would be given a diagnosis other than anxiety, such as Asperger’s syndrome or schizoid personality disorder. Therefore, inherent in the notion of an anxiety disorder is conflict Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical between approach-related drives (eg, to seek positive social interactions, to leave the house) and avoidance-related drives (eg, to prevent being humiliated or having a panic attack). In this review, we propose that the approach-avoidance perspective provides an important Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical framework for bridging the gap in knowledge about the relationship between brain and behavior, ie, to clarify the role of specific neural systems in anxiety. In particular, we review neural systems that, based on neuroimaging research related to approach, avoidance, and decision making, should be considered of utmost importance for approach-avoidance conflict processes. By combining knowledge regarding these neural systems Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical with implications from current

neuroimaging research in anxiety disorders, we will outline what important questions remain from an approach-avoidance perspective. As this review focuses on a few brain regions likely to play a vital role in conflict decision making in anxiety disorders, Brefeldin_A we do not extensively cover every brain system potentially involved, nor do we discuss related neurotransmitter systems (eg, dopaminergic, serotonergic; for review see refs 2,16-19). Secondly, our discussion focuses on conflict decision-making paradigms and excludes paradigms in which prescribed behavior conflicts with automatic selleck chemical Ruxolitinib reactions (eg, inhibition or interference tasks20,10) and self-report measures of approachavoidance or behavioral inhibition-activation.21 Lastly, we will limit our discussion of anxiety disorders to generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), social anxiety disorder (SAD), panic disorder, specific phobia, and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>